View Full Version: Jane Doe July 15, 1982 , Warren County, New Jersey.

fromwhisperstor >>JD 1980's >>Jane Doe July 15, 1982 , Warren County, New Jersey.


<< Prev | Next >>

Divine- 10-31-2005
Jane Doe July 15, 1982 , Warren County, New Jersey.
The Doe Network: Case File 36UFNJ Reconstructed Images Unidentified White Female Located on July 15, 1982 in Blairstown, Warren County, New Jersey. Cause of death was blunt force trauma to the head. Estimated date of death is July 11, 1982 Her nickname is Princess Doe -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vital Statistics Estimated age: 14 - 20 years old. Born around 1968. Approximate Height and Weight: 5'2"-5'4"; 90-100 lbs. Distinguishing Characteristics: Brown, straight shoulder-length hair. Both of her ears were pierced; her left ear was double-pierced. She wore nail polish on her right fingernails only. Dentals: Available. Lower anterior teeth are crowded. Clothing: The following items of clothing were found around the victim when she was discovered: Red v-neck pullover shirt with yellow piping on the front portion of the shoulder area and blue and black piping around the neck, sleeves and waist; Wrap-around skirt with red, white and blue print with a wide border of peacock designs on the lower portion; Gold-colored chain with small white beads and a 14-karat gold cross with an ornate design. Victim's Clothing and Accessories -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case History The victim was discovered in a wooded area of Blairstown Cemetary on Route 94 in Blairstown, New Jersey. She was partially unclothed. She was severly beaten prior to her death. Investigators have learned that the victim may have been a runaway. She may have worked as a hotel housekeeper in Ocean City, Maryland from 1979 - 1982. The unidentified runaway who worked at the hotel matched Princess Doe's description. The worker used several aliases while employed. Maryland is the last known locale of the unidentified girl. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investigators If you have any information concerning this young woman's identity or the circumstances surrounding her death, please contact: Warren County Prosecutor's Office Sgt. Steve Speirs Jr. 908-475-6275 OR New Jersey State Police 800-709-7090 All information may be submitted on an anonymous basis. NCIC Number: U-630870962 Please refer to this number when contacting any agency with information regarding this case. More info at: http://doenetwork.us/cases/36ufnj.html

Themis Eternal- 05-09-2006

Investigators study possible Maryland connection Princess Doe may have worked in shore town By DAN BURNETT Pocono Record Day Editor In September, detectives from the Warren County, N.J,. Prosecutor's Office held a press conference on the Princess Doe case, not in Blairstown or the county seat of Belvidere, but 230 miles from their office in Ocean City, Md. One detective, Bill Eppell, told the local Maryland media gathered in the police station in that seashore town that a $1,000 reward was being offered for information leading to the identification of a young murder victim who worked in Ocean City from 1979-82. Although the victim has been named Princess Doe shortly after her battered body was found dumped in a ravine in Blairstown, N.J,. in July 1982, the detectives never used that term. Through the years, the case has received international coverage, including a 20-minute spot on an HBO crime special in 1983. Detective Eppell, according to the Ocean City Today weekly newspaper, was paraphrased as saying "investigators believe she was in Ocean City during the years 1979 to 1982. They believe she worked in housekeeping at the Harrison Hall (hotel) during the summers of 1980 and 1981 and might have stayed in the North Division Street Area near the foot of the Route 50 bridge.'' The article also said that when the detectives from New Jersey were tracking down leads in July canvassing Ocean City hotels, they found six people who had information about the victim. But in an interview last week, Eppell's boss, Warren Prosecutor John J. O'Reilly, said his office has not determined yet that the victim, believed to be between 14 and 18 years old, was living in Ocean City, Md. He said his office has not ruled it out either. O'Reilly said the reporter who wrote the story "misconstrued what the detective said'' when she wrote her story. He would not comment further on specific information on this aspect of the case, nor would he say what evidence led his detectives to Ocean City. Story accurate, reporter says When told of the prosecutor's statement, the reporter said she stood by her work and that she was always willing to cooperate with police. She had no other comment. Detective Eppell, who is on vacation, was not available for comment last week, and his partner on this case, Detective Susan Bloodgood, said office policy dictates all information would have to come from Prosecutor O'Reilly. Jay Hancock, public relations officer for the 100-officer Ocean City Police Department, said the New Jersey reward is still being offered. As of Thanksgiving, he said three or four tips have been forwarded to Warren County. He did not know if any of the tips were helpful to New Jersey authorities. Other than assisting Warren County detectives when asked, his department does not have an active role in the Princess Doe case since the girl was murdered in New Jersey, Hancock said. "From what I recall, they were pretty sure the girl who had worked down here was the same girl who was found in New Jersey,'' Hancock said. The girl's identity — a key to finding her killer — has eluded authorities for more than 15 years. Hancock said Harrison Hall, where the teen is believed to have worked, is a large hotel on the boardwalk, and North Division Street where she is suspected of living has more modest rental properties that appeal to seasonal workers. If authorities are closer to learning who the girl was, they are not saying. Leads pursued Prosecutor O'Reilly said that many leads have been followed up on, especially in cases where mass murderers have targeted young women. When cases like that enter the limelight, O'Reilly said his detectives look into it to see if the killer's timeline could have crossed paths with Princess Doe. To date, no solid evidence has emerged from the legwork, he said. O'Reilly said he did not know if the murder victim's identity would ever be learned, but he said his office would follow up on every viable lead. "It's very painstaking work, there's no question about that. But sometimes you do get lucky,'' he said. http://www.vidocq.org/doe/doe3.html

Themis Eternal- 05-09-2006

Princess Doe: Dead among strangers A 1982 murder remains unsolved, but not forgotten By DAN BURNETT Pocono Record Day Editor When Princess Diana met her fate three months ago, thoughts of another tragic victim, Princess Doe, came to mind. Unlike her more famous counterpart, Princess Doe was likely near the bottom rung of the socio-economic ladder. She was a white teen-ager — a runaway in all likelihood, according to authorities — whose face was beaten beyond recognition in July 1982. Her body was then dumped alongside a cemetery on Route 94 in Blairstown, N.J., a speck of a town just 15 minutes east of Stroudsburg. Despite countless attempts to identify her — including a 20-minute spot on an HBO crime special that aired in 1983 — authorities know little more about the murder victim than they did 15 years ago: She was between 14 and 18 years old and was wearing a red V-neck pullover, a red, white and blue print wraparound skirt and a gold chain with tiny white beads and a 14-karat gold cross. Authorities also know that somebody was very angry at the girl, angry enough to bludgeon her face beyond recognition with a blunt object. Who that person is and the murder weapon have never been determined. Police sources have said it is very rare that a murder victim, particularly one who is so young, is still unidentified 15 years later. The case is old, but not forgotten. As recently as September the Warren County, N.J., Prosecutor's Office learned that the young woman likely was working in the tourist town of Ocean City, Md., from 1979 to 1982 as a hotel housekeeper. Presumed by police to be a runaway, she used several aliases, investigators have learned. This month — 15 years after the community of Blairstown buried the girl near the lonely spot where her battered body was dumped — Princess Doe made headlines again, this time in the New York Times . A prestigious group of current and former federal agents, former prosecutors and forensic specialists from around the world called the Vidocq Society met recently in Philadelphia to discuss the case. The private group is named after a 19th-century French detective credited with introducing the use of scientific tools and extensive record-keeping into police work. The elite group brainstorms on cold murder cases, sometimes offering insight that those who had investigated may have overlooked. The society has been credited with helping police throughout the country solve several cases. Frank Bender, a Philadelphia artist and forensic sculptor who made a bust of Princess Doe to help police put a face on the victim, is one of the founders of the prestigious group that boasts 82 original members and 100 special members. He and at least one other member had worked on the Princess Doe case, and it was their interest that brought it the attention of the society. Vidocq spokesman Dick Lavinthal, who works as a public affairs specialist with the U.S. Department of Justice, said the society provides professional investigators with a "cadre of law enforcement and forensic experts at no cost.'' The society meets bi-monthly in Philadelphia to discuss cases, and several members typically will form an ad-hoc committee to pursue cases they think they can help on, he said. Because the Princess Doe case is active, Lavinthal said he could not comment specifically on what other avenues were being pursued. Any fruitful information, he said, would be turned over to the Warren County, N.J., Prosecutor's Office, which is following up on new leads. Present at the Vidocq meeting was Warren County Prosecutor John J. O'Reilly, who was in Philadelphia to see if this group of experts could help his office develop any information. O'Reilly said members helped him with profiles of what the killer could be like. He is hopeful that someone in the society may turn up a substantial lead. The case, O'Reilly said, has been particularly difficult because authorities still do not know the identity of the girl. "It is a very troubling thing that there are kids who are runaways, and no one bothers to report them as missing. As a result, there's no record that these kids are out there somewhere.'' While O'Reilly and his detectives continue their footwork, the gravestone marking the girl's plot serves as a grim reminder of the perplexing case: Princess Doe: Missing From Home Dead Among Strangers Remembered By All Born ? — Found July 15, 1982 http://www.vidocq.org/doe/doe1.html

Themis Eternal- 05-09-2006

Policeman haunted by killer's presence By DAN BURNETT Pocono Record Day Editor By his own admission, former Blairstown, N.J., police lieutenant Eric Kranz became obsessed and then frustrated with the Princess Doe case. Kranz, who in 1982 was second in command at the small but spirited police department, headed up the investigation of the murdered teen. To this day, Kranz said he thinks he spoke to the teen's killer at the cemetery where she was found. But others involved in the investigation — state police and the Warren County Prosecutor's Office — did not want to interrogate the suspect until the girl was identified, he said. Princess Doe, an unidentified teen between 14 and 18 years old, was dumped in a ravine off Route 94 in the small New Jersey community just 15 minutes from Stroudsburg in July 1982. Despite the case still being open to this day, authorities do not know who the girl is or how she ended up bludgeoned beyond recognition in rural northern New Jersey. Kranz, who worked day and night on the case in its early years, said he met the suspect shortly after the girl was buried in January 1983. Citizens reported seeing him several times at her grave so Kranz went to the cemetery to see him. The man, who lived nearby, turned out to have a record of violence, being arrested for fighting with police and assaulting at least one family member before he moved to Blairstown. He traveled in his line of work, and he quite likely passed through Maryland — the girl's last known location before she died — at the time of her death, Kranz said. Kranz said he also spoke to his suspect's brother during the course of the investigation, who told the then-police lieutenant that his brother had the capacity to commit such a brutal crime. Kranz said he found no physical evidence linking the suspect to the crime, but the suspect sold his vehicle —which Kranz theorized was used to transport the murder victim — to an out-of-state party shortly after the girl's body was found. Kranz said he went to New York to search the vehicle, but was not able to get access to it. Kranz said the prosecutor at the time, Howard McGinn, told him not to interrogate the suspect until the girl was identified. "I have a very strong suspicion he is the killer,'' Kranz said. "I am the only one on God's green earth who really thought the guy did it, and I was never given the opportunity to pursue that the way I thought it should be done. . . . .This thing could have been solved years ago, but I didn't have it in me to pursue it anymore.'' Frustrated with his constant run-ins with other investigators assigned to the case by the New Jersey State Police, Kranz resigned from the township department in 1985. He is now disabled, recovering from a back injury. Kranz said his suspect moved from Blairstown in the past decade. He does not know where the man lives now. Different account McGinn, who was Warren County's prosecutor from 1981-86, said he does not remember Kranz having a suspect he wanted to interrogate. "I don't recall anything like that at all,'' said McGinn, who now has a private civil practice in Warren County. "That doesn't ring a bell.'' The state police investigators who worked on the case with Kranz have retired and left the area. They could not be reached for comment. But McGinn did say that the focus of the case from the outset was to find out who the victim was. "Because we couldn't positively identify her, we couldn't do much else until that was done. Once we had an ID, then we could have focused on who did it,'' said McGinn, who added that he was satisfied with Kranz's handling of the investigation. When told of Kranz's assertion there is a viable suspect, current Warren Prosecutor John J. O'Reilly said: "This case has been investigated extensively by my office and the state police. That's all I can really say about it. We pursued every lead we had.'' O'Reilly said he thought someone from his office had been in touch with Kranz, but Kranz said no law enforcement officers consulted with him since he left the police department 12 years ago. Kranz said the state police investigators did not get involved in the case for months, primarily because they knew it would be difficult to solve. When they did join the investigation, he and they butted heads frequently because the state police were constantly criticizing his procedures. Kranz called it an "embarrassment'' that a case requiring so much paperwork and legwork only had one township detective working on it in its early months until the state police answered his nine-man department's plea for help. Former prosecutor McGinn agreed there was not enough manpower in the case's early stages. "We were concerned about getting sufficient personnel on the case. Blairstown Police Department was small at the time, and of course our office was small at the time, too. But at some point the state police did get involved. I can't recall the timeline anymore after all these years,'' McGinn said. Obsessed with case Kranz said he became obsessed with Princess Doe because of the enormity of the workload and brutality of the crime. He labeled as a "failure'' the case's first mission: To determine the identity of the girl whose head was bludgeoned beyond recognition and whose body was then dumped in a ravine off Route 94 during a mid-July heat wave in 1982. After that, find the killer. Once word was out that the battered corpse had been found near a cemetery on July 15, 1982, hundreds of calls poured into the small police station, from parents whose children had run away, from police officers from other jurisdictions checking on missing persons and from cranks and tipsters. Scores of psychics called, offering their services, but were turned down, Kranz said. Also, Kranz examined hundreds of missing person and forensic reports in an effort to identify her. "I'm almost sure she passed through my work, but for the most ridiculous reason I did not recognize her,'' he said. For example, forensic reports told him that the corpse had no broken bones, so missing-person reports where the victims had once had broken bones were ruled out automatically. Then, Kranz said, he learned that some young people's bones mend in such a way that it is nearly impossible to tell that they were once broken. Hence, he said, some of the missing-person reports may had been valuable after all. "At times I was going through the trash can trying to backtrack,'' he said. Use of media The strategy from the outset was to keep the case in the media. Kranz named the girl "Princess Doe'' so that she would have some sort of identity and "a personality to keep her in the press.'' A forensic artist from Philadelphia was recruited to reconstruct her appearance in the form of a bust so that it could be photographed to make posters and fliers. The plan worked. Papers large and small ran stories on the bizarre case, TV crews covered press conferences and an HBO special on strange crimes did a 20-minute segment on it. The show aired nationally and generated many calls from parents who children had run away, but no significant leads materialized, he said. A novel, "Death Among Strangers,'' used the case as a backdrop. "I can't for the life of me understand how a life can be erased without anyone coming forward who has some idea who she was,'' said Kranz. The Warren County Prosecutor's Office, which has since taken over the case, determined three months ago that the girl was likely a runaway last living and working as a maid in Ocean City, Md. But investigators still do not know who she was or how she ended up dead in rural northwestern New Jersey. With the case taking a toll on Kranz's personal life, in 1985 he resigned to become executive director of the Foundation to Find and Protect Children, a lobby and investigative non-profit agency that helped parents find their runaway children. The job ended a year later when funding dried up. Since then Kranz said he has had a variety of jobs. "Whatever I had to do to make a living, I did,'' he said. He left Blairstown shortly after resigning from the police department, and he has maintained no ties. He will say only that he now lives in northern New Jersey. "I was so burned out after that case," he said. "It was enough to exasperate anyone.'' http://www.vidocq.org/doe/doe2.html

Themis Eternal- 05-09-2006

Princess Doe Timeline JULY 1982: Teen's body found in ravine on Route 94 near a Blairstown, N.J., cemetery. Her face was beaten beyond recognition. OCTOBER 1982: A Philadelphia forensic artist makes a bust of the girl's face. JANUARY 1983: Blairstown officials bury the girl in the cemetery where she was found. JUNE 1983: HBO airs a 20-minute spot on the case to an international audience. MARCH 1985: Blairstown Police Lt. Eric Kranz, the chief investigator on the case, resigns from the department. He never works in law enforcement again. JULY 1997: Warren County, N.J., detectives go to Ocean City, Md. and interview six people who had information about the victim, a runaway. SEPTEMBER 1997: Warren County detectives post a $1,000 reward in Ocean City for information about the still unidentified victim. NOVEMBER 1997: The Vidocq Society, a prestigious group of international crime experts, agree to re-examine the Princess Doe case. DEC. 16, 1997: The victim is still not identified and her killer is still free. http://www.vidocq.org/doe/doe4.html

Themis Eternal- 05-09-2006

Diane Genice Dye Vital Statistics at Time of Disappearance Missing Since: July 30, 1979 from San Jose, California Classification: Endangered Missing Date Of Birth: November 20, 1965 Age: 13 years old Height and Weight: 5'2, 110 pounds Distinguishing Characteristics: Brown hair, hazel eyes. Clothing Description: A blue shirt and light blue corduory pants. Details of Disappearance Dye was last seen in her hometown of San Jose, California on July 30, 1979. The circumstances surrounding her disappearance are unclear; some believe she ran away voluntarily from her home, while others disagree. She has never been heard from again. Several officials believe that Dye may be the homicide victim known as "Princess Doe." The unidentified female's remains were located in New Jersey in 1982. She was approximately 16 years old, which was around the same age as Dye. The results of dental comparisons were inconclusive, meaning Dye could not be ruled out as Princess Doe, nor was the body proven to be Dye's remains. Investigating Agency If you have any information concerning this case, please contact: San Jose Police Department 408-277-4141 http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/d/dye_diane.html

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.