Local lawmakers pleased with act's first year
Latest update: Monday, Sep 04, 2006 - 12:43:13 am EDT
Two Citrus County legislators say children are safer than they were a year ago with passage of the Jessica Lunsford Act, but they say more can be done.
Still, state Rep. Charlie Dean and Sen. Nancy Argenziano differ on proposals that would tweak the act and other laws regarding sexual offenders.
The law, named after the Homosassa child authorities say was kidnapped, sexually assaulted and murdered, stiffens criminal penalties for crimes against children and requires extensive background checks on adults who work on school sites.
Argenziano, R-Dunnellon, said the act has had a wide-ranging impact.
“It’s the toughest law in the nation about locking people up who prey on our children. It’s just long overdue,” she said. “Now the rest of the nation has been adopting Florida’s law.”
One area of contention has been the degree of background check needed for people on school sites, particularly those who work in the construction business or repair companies.
Argenziano said she would be in favor checking names through a sexual offender or predator registry only so long as those workers on school sites have no contact with children. Other workers with the potential of unsupervised contact with children still should be fingerprinted for criminal backgrounds, she said.
Dean, R-Inverness, said the House passed legislation that required all sexual offenders and predators to be identified on their driver’s licenses. He said the bill, which sailed through the House with just one negative vote, didn’t return from the Senate in time for final passage before the legislative session ended.
He said anyone who has unsupervised contact with children still would be fingerprinted, but the bill would have simplified the way other workers are identified as predators or offenders.
“It was an excellent, excellent choice,” he said. “We couldn’t get the Senate to move on it and get it back on a timely fashion.”
Argenziano and Dean also differ about whether the term “sexual offender” should distinguish between people who prey on children and young adults who have consensual sex with teenagers.
Argenziano said she doesn’t think it’s fair that a young adult who has consensual sex with a teenage girlfriend be lumped in the same category as someone who improperly touches or fondles a child.
It’s especially bothersome when someone checks a Web site to see a recognizable name listed as a sexual offender.
“The average person doesn’t look at the difference,” she said. “The average person just thinks he’s a pervert.”
Dean said it should be up a judge, and not the Legislature, to decide if someone convicted of a sexual crime is an offender or not.
“I think we’ve been doing the right thing to allow judges to make judicial decisions,” he said.
Despite their differences, both lawmakers say the Jessica Lunsford Act has done what it should.
“I still see Jessie’s face all the time,” Argenziano said. “I cannot believe the horrible way that little child died. This at least lets every child go to bed at night with some feeling that they’re a little safer.”
http://www.chronicleonline.com/articles/2006/09/04/news/news40.txt