View Full Version: THE TOUCH THAT HURTS - A Series of Articles

fromwhisperstor >>Inside the Mind Of… >>THE TOUCH THAT HURTS - A Series of Articles


<< Prev | Next >>

Gaia- 03-22-2006
THE TOUCH THAT HURTS - A Series of Articles
Posted: 3-21-2006 THE TOUCH THAT HURTS: Tracking convicted sex offenders Part I of a series By JOE BOOMGAARD Daily News Staff Writer Sex may sell, but sex crimes repel. No one wants to hear about sex crimes, but everyone wants to know who the sex criminals are. Is this or that person a sex offender? Is that creepy guy a pedophile? Are my kids safe walking to school? Are the sex offenders living nearby? Sex crimes, the perpetrators and their victims may be taboo topics, reserved for the police blotter or the courts report in this newspaper. Occasionally, a perpetrator is someone of high profile in the community, and his or her name gets mentioned following an arrest and conviction. When the perpetrator who was someone familiar and trusted is arrested or convicted, everyone gasps and expresses shock and fear. What’s a parent or concerned individual to do? For the parent, their neighbor, and others wanting to be vigilant, there are many resources to find out who those convicted of sex crimes are and where they live in our community. Web site causes stir A Web site allowing people to type in an address and see a map of nearby sex offenders in their area blazed through many people’s e-mail accounts in the past month. Nervous, concerned parents sheepishly typed in their addresses in the hopes that their neighbor — or someone they knew — was not on the list. The Family Watchdog Web site, www.familywatchdog.us, says the group gets its information from public sex offender databases, like Michigan’s Public Sex Offender Registry. Published by the Michigan State Police, MIPSOR is available both online at www.mipsor.state.mi.us and at local law enforcement agencies. The Family Watchdog Web site shows a map of the area surrounding the address and indicates with color-keyed dots where sex offenders live and what type of sex crime they committed — all juicy and practical information. The site takes the MIPSOR one step further and provides a visual reference where sex offenders live in relation to a typed-in address. MIPSOR allows for sex offender searches by ZIP code and name, and in most cases, provides a photo of the offender. The site also describes the technical crime for which the person was convicted Lt. Kevin Leavitt, Post Commander of the Michigan State Police Hart post, said he could not verify the accuracy of the Family Watchdog Web site and encouraged residents to only trust the Michigan Public Sex Offender Registry. “If you’re concerned, come in to look at our information,” Leavitt said. “I think it’s a great tool for law enforcement and for citizens to check out who lives in their community.” Offender registration laws Sex offenders on the MIPSOR list have to register at least once per year. Those convicted of felony sex crimes must verify their address quarterly, while those convicted of misdemeanor sex crimes must register annually. Michigan laws call for two forms of sex offender registration, one public and one only available to law enforcement. The Sex Offenders Registration (SOR) Act requires all offenders to register their addresses with law enforcement after conviction and prior to sentencing. All offenders convicted of a felony-listed offense must report to a local law enforcement agency to verify their address during the first 15 days of January, April, July, and October. Offenders remain in the registry for 25 years or life, depending on the conviction. Misdemeanor-listed offenders must verify in the first 15 days of January each year. Michigan laws call for two forms of sex offender registration, one public and one only available to law enforcement. In 1996, the Public Sex Offender Registry was established, and in 1999, the registry went online, allowing for searches by ZIP code or name and approximate age to identify registered sex offenders. Certain offenders — juveniles and those who have completed probation — are exempt from the public list but remain on the SOR. In addition, an e-mail sex offender notification law was passed by the Michigan legislature and was signed into law March 2. The new law, which takes effect January 2007, allows residents to sign up for an e-mail notification when a sex offender moves into their area. The design of the new system is yet to be worked out. The Michigan State Police also conducts an annual sweep, called Operation Verify, to ensure sex offenders are living at their registered addresses. “Here at Hart, along with Mason County Sheriff and Oceana County Sheriff and local agencies, we continue to look at the system to see if there are any offenders who change address without notifying us. We actively pursue those cases,” Leavitt said. Leavitt said troopers who come in contact with sex offenders throughout the regular course of business — such as traffic stops — check to ensure the offender is living where he or she claims. “When we run a background check, the system will pop up that they are a sex offender and we verify their address by asking them questions, checking their drivers license, and so on,” Leavitt said. “We do the sweeps — quite frequently now — but one trooper, Tpr. Russ Carston, has really taken this program under his wing, and he does a good job of it. If you name a sex offender in your area, he could probably tell you his or her address and what they did.” School safety zones, and one blind spot? In 2005, the Michigan Legislature passed Public Acts 121, 126 and 127 which prohibit sex offenders from residing, working or loitering within a “school safety zone,” defined as an area that lies 1,000 feet or less from a school property. Offenders who worked or resided within a school safety zone before Jan. 1, 2006 are exempted. Two sex offenders listed in public registry in the 49431 ZIP code live within the school safety zone, according to measurements taken by the Ludington Daily News using GPS technology. These offenders are grandfathered in under the new law and are not in violation. What the safety zone does not cover may surprise you. The law does not restrict sex offenders around licensed day care centers. In February, a cross reference of the list of sex offenders on the Family Watchdog Web site and state list of licensed day care centers in the 49431 ZIP code found sex offenders living within a quarter of a mile of 27 of the 57 licensed day care centers. Two facilities had listed offenders involving minors within a quarter of a mile, according to the Web site. Mason County Sheriff Laude Hartrum said sex offenders living near day care providers are “definitely an issue that needs to be addressed.” “As sheriff, I try to do everything I can to keep kids safe, and I think this is a serious issue, but in some respects, it’s a question best answered by the legislature,” Hartrum said. Ludington Police Chief Mark Barnett agreed. “Ultimately, the legislature would have to decide what makes sense, but every law has to pass a court test. The court has to take a little bit different perspective considering the constitutionality for all involved,” Barnett said. “Philosophically, it’s a no-brainer that there should be some distance that sex offenders have to maintain, but part of problem is having a definitive list of where these places are.” Leavitt, Hartrum and Barnett said the key to keeping children safe is awareness. “I think parents need to know where their kids are at all times, and they need to know who their neighbors are,” Hartrum said. “They need to use good common sense and not let kids get into a vulnerable position.” Hartrum said he thought the sex offender registry is “a good tool” for parents to use to be vigilant about their neighbors. “The registry is in place to give parents more tools to protect their kids. Ultimately, law enforcement can only do so much, and it’s incumbent on parents to take an active role in protecting kids from sexual predators whether in their neighborhood or on the Internet,” Hartrum said. jboomgaard@ludingtondailynews.com http://www.ludingtondailynews.com/news.php?story_id=30640

Gaia- 03-22-2006

Posted: 3-22-2006 THE TOUCH THAT HURTS: Making the case against abusers Part II in a series By JOE BOOMGAARD Daily News Staff Writer (Yesterday, the laws and procedures for the sex offender registry were reviewed. Today, the series takes a look at how law enforcement investigates these crimes.) Sexual abuse is a crime. Law enforcement has the responsibility to investigate crimes and help victims of crime find justice. In the investigation of sexual abuse cases, law enforcement must balance the special needs of often fragile victims with the burden of proof needed to establish facts, make arrests and successfully prosecute these criminals. The first step in the investigation is getting the victim or someone who knows the victim to come forward. Much more — especially psychologically — goes into a criminal investigation of a sexual abuse complaint. When a criminal sexual conduct (CSC) report is referred to the prosecutor’s office, it is assigned to the appropriate law enforcement agency which will coordinate an on-scene and a medical examination of the victim. An interview follows. With child victims, law enforcement agencies must follow a forensic interviewing protocol. “In this county, we do multi-disciplinary team investigations that reduce the number of times a victim has to be interviewed,” Mason County Sheriff Laude Hartrum said. Kids’ House, a part of the Andre Bosse Center, is a part of that investigative team. “Most children do not disclose (sexual abuse) right away,” said Cynthia Cole, program director and forensic interviewer at Kids House. “They’re told it’s a secret, it’s something special, or the abuser said they’ll hurt them if they tell.” To draw those details from the victims, the forensic interviewer performs a specific examination of the facts of the case as told from the child’s point of view. “I don’t ask any leading questions - there is no suggestiveness,” Cole said. “We have to be as precise as possible.” To get children to open up, Cole said she must first gain their trust as the interviewer. “I talk a lot and try to do anything to get them to talk to me,” Cole said. Once they open up, she runs them through a series of questions to determine whether the child knows the difference between truth and lies, places, colors, body parts, and so on, all while using terms children use. She gets them to describe a “good touch” versus a “bad touch.” Once the child shows he or she can distinguish differences and trusts the interviewer, Cole said she starts to get details of the abuse. She said she allows the child to give his or her account, and then goes back over the story to gain the sequence and the necessary details for making a case. “We want to come to a point where they’re only telling their story once,” Cole said. They don’t the child to be re-victimized over and over again by having to recount the story several times. That’s why law enforcement monitors the forensic interviews — to cut down on the number of times the story has to be told. The forensic interviewers — along with detectives from the Sheriff’s Office — interview victims. The detectives do not have direct contact with the victim, but monitor the questioning. “We monitor the interview and take notes, and try to get all the elements of the crime, if possible,” said Jordan Hartley, a detective with the Mason County Sheriff’s Office for 14 years. Instead of the child having to relive the traumatic experience for each interviewer, the detectives communicate questions to the interviewer via ear microphones to get the facts of the case from one interview. More and more CSC cases are now involving DNA evidence that provides indisputable proof of the abuse in court, Hartley said. “We always try to get DNA evidence if we can,” Hartley said. But DNA evidence is only part of making a case in court, Hartrum acknowledged. “In court, you want to overwhelm the offender with everything you know,” Hartrum said. “If the offender realizes you have a lot of information, they will likely plead out.” If the victim’s story passes muster, the law enforcement agencies move forward with the investigation. Next, the detectives question any possible witnesses. Finally, after gathering the information in the investigation, the officers interrogate the suspect. Usually, the person in question already knows why he or she is being interviewed, Hartley said. The key is to try to gain the suspect’s confidence and get him to tell his side of the story in the interview. “If they think you’re judging them, that’s the end of the interview,” Hartley said. “You never tell them more than they think you have on them. You get everything you can get beforehand and then sit down and do the interrogation. “And if they did it, when they talk to you, you’re going to know. I’ll know 99 times out of 100 if they did it or not. That doesn’t mean I can prove it, but I’ll know.” Hartley looks for clues indicating guilt, but said he didn’t want to disclose specifically what those clues are. Once the interview is completed, the detectives review all of the information pertinent to the case. “At that point, the suspect may go in for a polygraph test, we may send the case to the prosecutor’s office for a warrant, or the case could be shelved as unfounded,” Hartrum said. Burden is on victim in court The prosecutor then reviews the case. Law enforcement sends a report of their findings, and the prosecutor’s office must decide whether the case is sufficient. “We look to see if there’s enough evidence to meet the statutes,” said Susan Kasley, Mason County Prosecutor. If the level of proof is met, she said the case proceeds to court. Most cases, especially those without DNA evidence, wind up in court because the cases are based on one person’s word versus another person’s, Kasley said. “When it’s one person’s word, most defendants take their chances at trial,” Kasley said. “My challenge is to get the jury to understand that the victim’s testimony is proof. It’s one of the biggest hurdles in the case.” Pitting two people’s testimony against each other in sexual abuse cases is no different from many types of court cases, Kasley said, but the emotion inherent in sexual abuse trials adds a dimension to the case. “Sex offender cases are emotionally difficult,” Kasley said. “It’s harder for the victim and the jurors in these cases. These types of things do happen in small towns.” Ultimately, the success of the case comes back to the victim’s cooperation and ability to say what happened. Kasley said she tries to prepare the victims as much as possible by taking them to through the courtroom and familiarizing them with the proceedings as much as possible. “I try to get them to have some comfort level in court,” Kasley said. Some victims just don’t want to go through with the process because of the pain of reliving their abuse. “The biggest hurdle is the victim’s ability to tell their story in court,” Hartrum said. “There are some victims who have gone through the system more than once who think the cure is worse than the disease.” “They’ll say ‘I don’t want it to happen anymore, but I don’t care if the guy goes to prison,’” Hartley said. “The kids can be really, really messed up — they’ll never be normal functioning adults because of being victims of sexual abuse as kids.” jboomgaard@ludingtondailynews.com http://www.ludingtondailynews.com/news.php?story_id=30661

Gaia- 03-25-2006

Posted: 3-23-2006 THE TOUCH THAT HURTS: Survivors struggle with lifelong pain Part III of a series (Yesterday, this series looked into the law enforcement aspect of developing a criminal sexual conduct case. Law enforcement agencies recognize their court cases are only as good as the victims’ abilities to tell their stories. Today, this series looks at how survivors of sexual abuse cope and heal.) By JOE BOOMGAARD Daily News Staff Writer Sexual abuse survivors face a troubling fate. If they tell their painful secrets and prosecute the abuser, they could be stigmatized as damaged goods and have to go through the ache of telling their story. If they don’t tell what happened to them, they struggle with the inner demons forced upon them by the abuser, and the abuser remains free to again victimize them or others. Robbed innocence Sexual abusers effect life-altering change on their victims. For the survivors of sexual abuse, myriad emotions and fears make the abuse unspeakable. Some survivors eventually find their voice. One mother of an abused child spoke with the Daily News on the condition she would remain anonymous. Even though the abuse occurred more than two decades ago, affects of the abuse linger on for both mother and child. To woman’s ex-husband pleaded guilty to third degree criminal sexual conduct after years of sporadic, but nonetheless terrible abuse. He served time in prison, was released back into the community and lives minutes away from his victim. Because the incident took place before the sex offender registry law was passed in 1996, his name does not appear on any sex offender list. After 25 years of learning to cope with the abuse, the mother and child have strong feelings. They hurt for each other and are angry the abuser now walks free, waiting for other opportunities to strike again, in their opinion. “Intellectually, you can understand a lot of things, but emotionally — not so well,” the mother said. The mother still bears the emotional burden of not realizing the abuse occurred. She feels she let her child down by not protecting the child from the abuse. “Why didn’t I see it?” the mother said. “My ex-husband was the last person I would have thought of. You don’t expect that kind of person is the one that you love and trust the most. It was something so bizarre to me. We’re always supposed to tell children to protect themselves from strangers. You just don’t look for it in the people that you trust. I didn’t know I had to protect my child in my own home.” When her child revealed the abuse, she fell into a fit of disbelief and could not stop apologizing for “failing” her child. “My ex-husband was a good member of community. By all appearances, nothing was wrong. Everything appeared average. You can’t look at people and tell they’re an abuser. There is no stereotype.” Abusers prey on children The type of abuse in the child’s case is not unusual. The most common victims of sexual abuse are minors. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, 66.9 percent of victims of all reported sexual abuse are age 17 or younger. Only 7.4 percent of reported sexual abuse victims are older than 34 years old. Kids’ House, a part of the Andre Bosse Center in Ludington, deals with child victims of all kinds of abuse, not just sexual abuse. Nonetheless, the group sees nearly 500 cases of sexual abuse each year. Counselors there try to turn child victims of sexual abuse into survivors. The staff at the center promotes healing by providing a safe, caring environment. “We try to feel comfortable, not official,” said Marta Kistler, child advocate coordinator at Kids’ House. She and the staff pool community resources to “offer services to the families to make the situation easier,” she said. The child-friendly milieu makes it easier for the abused to feel comfortable enough to tell their story. Cynthia Cole, program director and forensic interviewer at Kids’ House, said children have a difficult time talking about the abuse because it’s often committed by someone they are taught to look up to and trust. There is no blanket description of a sexual abuser, she said. Younger children also have the hardest time telling what happened to them. “Older kids are clued in by preventative programs,” Cole said. “They’re not as naïve. But the younger kids don’t tell for a long time. They’re afraid their parents won’t believe them or that they’ll be mad at them.” Parents won’t always see obvious signs of sexual abuse, according to Cole. Physical signs of sexual abuse only occur about 5 percent of the time. It’s usually up to the child to reveal the abuse. Once children open their doors, it’s up to the forensic interviewer to make a case that will stand up in court. The forensic interview gleans the information from the children and assesses the validity of the statements. “If they can disclose the abuse and get it out, then they can put medication on it and start to heal,” Cole said. “The child who was molested always knows what happened, and they need to get it out. It’s not their fault. They’re still OK; they’re a good person; they’re not dirty.” While getting the story out can be healthy, the setting in which it’s told must be considered. Telling the story in front of an accuser in an open courtroom often proves difficult, as the mother found out. In the first go-around in court for a hearing, the child took the stand, but “when it came to more intimate details,” her child “clammed up and wouldn’t talk.” The second time around, the mother worked with her child and told the child to look directly at her during the testimony — not at the prosecutor, not at the abuser, not at the attorneys. The child was able to testify enough that the father was charged. He pleaded guilty to “spare the family from embarrassment,” the mother said sarcastically. “By him going to jail, it showed the blame didn’t belong to my child,” the mother said. “The perpetrators need to have the blame put on them. It’s so important sexual abusers be prosecuted. The victims need to know it’s not their fault. The older they get, the more important that becomes. “The victims don’t have to live as victims their whole lives, but the remnants of being the victim are there their whole lives. The trauma stays there.” The healing process Once the story is told, and perhaps after the court proceedings are over, children can begin to heal from the pain of the abuse. Cole said many victims are reluctant to go to counseling, but they need “to put the abuse back here on the shelf. It’s always there, but they need to say ‘I’m done with it.’” The mother said the counseling came many years later for her child. Although the child refused to talk about the abuse, the mother sought advice from a crisis counselor to learn how best to help her child heal. “The counselor said at some point in time, my child was going to need counseling, but she felt that you don’t over-traumatize a child who’s been traumatized,” the mother said. While her child coped “surprisingly well,” the mother said problems still existed. The child had a difficult time learning to trust peers and adults. “My child’s been let down by a lot of people,” the mother said. “Friends’ parents wouldn’t let my child come over anymore after the abuse. After finding someone who my child thought was a great friend and told the story to, the friend blurted out the story in a classroom. That was a most traumatic thing.” Shortly after the child told about the abuse, other problems arose when the child was sleeping. “Waking my child up was a real challenge,” the mother said. No one can touch the child to rouse the child from sleep. People were hit over the head with a clock or scratched trying to wake the child. “There’s a terror in my child’s eyes — you don’t ever want to see that terror,” the mother said. As a coping mechanism, mother and child have became devoted friends, an emotional support team. “We depended on each other,” the mother said. “We were the only ones we trusted, and we learned not to talk about it with anyone but each other. It took years to put it on the back burner because we were so hurt by what happened. But we were there for each other emotionally.” Just as the crisis counselor predicted, the child eventually sought counseling 20 years after the abuse and prospered since, according to the mother. “You’d never guess what my child has gone through,” the mother said. Emotional problems persist Others abused children aren’t so lucky. Cole said victims may be extremely compliant or aggressive following the abuse. Therapy and counseling combat these behaviors, Cole said. Children are impressionable and willing to please, something playing into abusers’ desires. Some children think they must continue with behavior pleasing to the abuser even after the abuse stops, according to Cole. The child is so inclined to act on the abuser’s urges that the child may not understand the nature of the action. The key, Cole said, is for caretakers to set boundaries. Some victims go down the road of self-destructive behavior, according to Cole. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), “Sexual violence can have very harmful and lasting consequences for victims, families and communities.” Besides physical problems arising from sexual assault, victims can endure many psychological consequences. The CDC lists immediate psychological consequences like shock, fear, denial, guilt and distrust, as well as chronic mental issues like depression, attempted or completed suicide, alienation, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unhealthy diet as resulting from sexual violence. Social relationships can also be strained. Some research has shown sexual abuse victims exhibit risky, unhealthy behaviors like engaging in high-risk sexual behavior and using harmful substances including cigarettes, alcohol, or drugs. Kids’ House tries to direct these victims and their families toward community resources such as counselors and parenting classes to prevent those problems. Kids’ House tries to help the healing process begin. They help out with little things, too, like care packages and blankets for the children once they’ve told their stories in forensic interviews. The gifts act as rewards to reinforce positive behavior for telling the secrets, Cole said. Pain lurks around every corner The saga doesn’t end when the abusers get out of prison, the mother said. Living in a small community, the child had a chance encounter with the abusive father 25 years after the abuse — after he had served prison time. “He came up to my child and said he had no remorse,” the mother said. “People think that the prison system works. That says it does not.” The accidental meeting led the mother to realize the painful events have the potential to continue even after the abuser goes to prison. “People think it stops when they go to prison and get out,” the mother said. “But the story doesn’t stop there, not for the victims — maybe not for the molester.” The mother thinks the offenders should be treated like mentally ill patients who are not released into the community until officials are convinced the patients are not a danger to the community. In the mother’s opinion, prison might not be the answer. “They need treatment so intense that a prison setting is not going to be able to provide it,” the mother said. jboomgaard@ludingtondailynews.com 843-1122, ext. 309 http://www.ludingtondailynews.com/news.php?story_id=30671

Chickadee- 03-25-2006
The touch thats hurts
The touch that hurts Daily News Staff Writer Society fears the sex criminal — the rapist, the pervert, the pedophile. We read prevention tips and learn self defense strategies to keep one step ahead of the criminal. We scour Internet Web sites to check on new neighbors, a person at work or the people who handle our children. Could we be missing the point? Perhaps in our rush to look in fear at everyone outside of our homes, we’re neglecting to look for the most common source of sexual abuse — our own families, friends, and acquaintances. Protecting the wrong places? Everyone wants to be safe from sexual abuse. Wanting to keep people safe, governments passed laws establishing sex offender registries and safety zones around schools. They require sex offenders to register when they move and make available their photographs and addresses for public viewing. Supporters say these laws protect children and help people be vigilant. And while these laws sound good, one significant question remains — do they work? “This is an incredibly complicated question most people aren’t willing to think a lot about,” said Patrick McFarlane of Interim Counseling in Ludington. McFarlane counsels sex offenders and abuse survivors in the Mason County area. His sex offender clients come via parole and corrections referrals as well as independently. He also counsels victims of abuse of all kinds. He said Megan’s Law — which mandates community notification of sex offenders posing a risk to the community - and the 1,000-foot school safety zone law sound good on paper. In practice, he questions their effectiveness in protecting children from the preponderance of sexual abuse. “The sad reality is that most abuse happens in families by a person well known to the family,” McFarlane said. “The overwhelming majority of sexual abuse happens in families. There are people who are pedophiles who we don’t want around kids, but those cases are pretty rare. Most people don’t meet the criteria for pedophilia. With pedophiles, we need to monitor them and supervise them with lifetime supervision.” The Center for Sex Offender Management, an organization sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice, determined approximately 60 percent of boys and 80 percent of girls who are sexually victimized are abused by someone “known to the child or the child’s family.” “Relatives, friends, baby-sitters, persons in positions of authority over the child, or persons who supervise children are more likely than strangers to commit a sexual assault,” the report stated. “We must also remember — the Department of Justice, based on survey research, estimates that maybe 4 to 6 percent of sexual abuse is reported and only 1 to 3 percent of reported cases are ever prosecuted,” McFarlane said. “Upwards of 90 percent of all sexual abuse is never reported.” Because of the low level of reporting, the CSOM believes the approximately 265,000 convicted sex offenders in the United States represents less than 10 percent of the total sex offenders nationwide. McFarlane also brings up one of the often-criticized aspects of sex offender law — it treats dissimilar situations as if they were the same offense. “The laws, if applied equally to all people who get a (criminal sexual conduct) case, could be enforced on a 17-year-old with 15-year-old girlfriend,” McFarlane said of the so called “Romeo and Juliet” situations. “I don’t think we need to treat someone dating someone in their own high school (the same as a pedophile).” Current laws do little to assess the risks offenders pose and rubber stamp all of them with the same sex offender label, McFarlane said. “Everyone can present risk,” McFarlane said. “The levels of risk vary given who the person is. We need to manage for all different kinds of risk. We can’t do it with one law for all people.” Some in law enforcement agree. “The sex offender registry is not properly done,” said Det. Jordan Hartley of the Mason County Sheriff’s Office. “ I think child offenders and predators need to be on there. There is no cure for a pedophile. But if a 17-year-old boy gets caught with a 15-year-old girlfriend — they shouldn’t be having sex. It happens — but he’s not a predator.” Let out to prey again? Some have questioned whether sex offenders should be released from prison at all if they pose a risk to society. What happens to offenders once they get out of jail? The CSOM noted recidivism rates for sex offenders are less in comparison to the rest of the criminal population. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in a 2003 report, Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994, stated 5.3 percent of all sex offenders, 5.1 percent of child molesters, and 5 percent of statutory rapists — upon release from prison — were rearrested and reconvicted in three years for a new sex crime. Another 2.2 percent of sex offenders were rearrested for sex crimes against a child. In 76.2 percent of those cases, the child was younger than 13. The DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics found sex offenders were less likely than non-sex offenders to be rearrested for any criminal offense — 43 percent of sex offenders were rearrested compared to 68 percent of non-sex offenders. Sex offenders were nearly four times as likely as non-sex offender criminals to be rearrested for a sex crime, the report stated. The study also described the victims in sex crimes committed by male inmates serving a sentence in prison in 1997. It found that 91.2 percent of victims were female, 73.2 percent were white, 70.5 percent were 17 or younger, and 36.4 percent were 12 or younger. In only 15.6 percent of the cases, the abuser was a stranger, the report stated. Many groups argue the benefits of therapy for these offenders. In essence, the restrictive laws also prevent the offenders from being able to prove they have been rehabilitated, according to McFarlane. “A probation officer said it eloquently to me — if we make it so difficult for these people to function normally, they won’t function normally,” McFarlane said. “Michigan’s version of Megan’s Law and the 1,000-foot rule, for some people, is very appropriate. For others it applies to, we do far more damage than keep anyone safe. It helps perpetrate the myth that sexual abuse happens outside because of some stranger.” A public health model If the laws aren’t working as planned, then how should sex offenders be treated in society? The Center for Disease Control (CDC) advocates a public health approach to prevention of sexual abuse, rather than focusing on registries and tracking offenders after the fact. In the model, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. “The system puts the onus on the actor and the adults that know the actor (rather than the abused) to report the incidents,” McFarlane said. “We need innovative prevention methods. Now, we’re limited to talking to little kids, telling them to say no, watch out for strangers, and report improper behavior. But if close to 90 percent of abuse happens within the family, how do we teach kids to say no to a trusted adult we teach them to look up to?” He cites Vermont, Massachusetts, and Minnesota as having innovative sexual abuse programs. One model uses a 24-hour call-in center to encourage people to talk about “the touch that hurts.” The models don’t force the issue of sexual abuse specifically because of the difficulty most people discussing such private matters. The call center encourages people to call in to discuss if they’ve hurt someone or if they know someone who is being hurt. Stop It Now!, a program offered in Georgia, Minnesota, Vermont and the city of Philadelphia, reaches out to abusers or those at risk for abusing. The program challenges at-risk abusers to step forward for help and to take responsibility for any crimes they may have committed. The individuals call a toll-free helpline to get referrals and information. The organization also helps bystanders, family and friends who are concerned about a situation yet may not have specific information of abuse. The prevention model operates on three main premises: • adults stepping forward to bear the responsibility of preventing abuse • abusers stopping their harmful actions and receiving proper treatment • and abusers living in communities once they’ve been rehabilitated. According to the Stop It Now! Web site, the organization does not think child sex abusers are “monsters.” Rather they are “adults who are responsible for their criminal behavior and who can choose to stop the abuse. Our responsibility is to hold abusers accountable for their actions and to offer the challenge and support to do the right thing.” The CSOM describes current sex offender treatment as a combination of cognitive-behavioral treatment and relapse prevention, along with focused therapy on “victimization awareness and empathy training, cognitive restructuring, learning about the sexual abuse cycle, and relapse prevention planning,” among others. The Center also found that because of the lower recidivism rate among offenders who are given effective therapy, therapy is cheaper for society in the long run. Vigilance over ignorance If sex offenders receive therapy and can get over their problems, should we just ignore them altogether? Law enforcement and child advocates say that’s a dangerous proposal. Not everyone thinks therapy works or is enough to safeguard communities. “I think there is a very low percentage (of offenders who are successfully treated),” Mason County Sheriff Laude Hartrum said. “My impression is, given the opportunity, most would re-offend. If a guy’s a predatory sexual offender, he’s going to re-offend.” Hartrum explains the low recidivism rates as a result of “more of a treatment focus in the prisons. Abusers are monitored more closely than they were before.” Despite his opinions, Hartrum doesn’t think all sex offenders should be locked up forever. “I don’t think you ever just throw away the key. But with predatory sexual offenders, you need to have stiff enforcement and a lot of monitoring after they’re released.” While Lt. Kevin Leavitt of the Michigan State Police believes law enforcement groups adequately keep tabs on these offenders, he thinks people in the community still have the responsibility to be vigilant. “People should avoid any unwanted contact with these individuals,” Leavitt said. “Congress and legislatures have passed laws allowing people to view information about sex offenders because of (the nature of the crimes). In today’s world, it is important for everyone to stay on top of what’s going on in their community. Law enforcement needs the help of the community to fight crime. If the public sees activity that seems unusual, not just with sex offenders, they need to notify area law enforcement.” Det. Hartley agreed. “It’s our job to protect people, especially kids,” Hartley said. “But many of these situations can be avoided if parents would just be involved with their children.” Cynthia Cole said prevention is the key to ending the cycle of sexual abuse. “A lot of kids’ parents are just trying to make ends meet,” Cole said. “But they need to get into the mindset that they come home and spend time with their kids, or someone else will.” jboomgaard@ludingtondailynews.com http://www.ludingtondailynews.com/news.php?story_id=30680

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.